Warnings of “variants” keeps “pandemic” going and underscores vaccine push

There is dispute between doctors and scientists on some issues, as with debates regarding how dangerous variants could be, but curiously, where some agree, is on their opposition to the vaccine rollout, with detractors of the vaccines ranging from those who have been critical of other vaccines in the past to doctors and scientists who have worked/ are working on developing vaccines.

Read more

Vaccine adverse events

In the previous post a scientist confirms that these vaccines could alter human DNA

Stabiliser in vaccines – polyethylene glycol (PEG) – causes allergic and autoimmune responses

In an article on Global Research on 8 March 2021, Mike Whitney notes that the vaccine made by Pfizer contains polyethylene glycol to “stabilise” it. In a 10 December 2020 article on Reuters, it was reported in an article titled: “UK issues anaphylaxis warning on Pfizer vaccine after adverse reactions,” that doctors were warning “that those who had had anaphylactic reactions in the past, and those prone to allergic reactions, should rather not take the vaccine, since this could lead  to severe or even potentially life-threatening adverse events. They acknowledge that this reaction could be caused by the inclusion of polyethylene glycol as an ingredient. However, the overall the benefits still outweigh the risks, according to doctors.”

Read more

Models grossly exaggerated, virus waning before lockdowns imposed

This post follows on from the overview of the basis of calling COVID-19 a a pandemic. Soon after lockdowns were imposed, based on the Imperial College (IPC) model, as discussed in previous posts, another team of scientists put forward a very different model that suggested the infection rate had already started to fall before lockdowns were initiated, making the catastrophic impact of shutting down economies completely unnecessary. This has been proven to be correct, with the ghastly mortality rates predicted by the IPC being orders of magnitude lower, and many analysts putting forward critiques reveal the flaws of model that show how flawed it is.

Read more

The basis of the COVID-19 “pandemic”

This follows on from the Introduction.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is defined as an infectious disease caused by an allegedly newly discovered coronavirus, identified as, “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” (SARS-CoV-2). The World Health Organisation (WHO) declared COVID-19 a global pandemic on 22 March 2020, based on the modelled projections by a team of nearly four dozen researchers – led by Neil Ferguson at Imperial College in London, UK, – the “Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team” (IPC), together with the WHO Collaborating Center for Infectious Disease Modeling as co-authors.

Read more

Has the SARS CoV-2 virus been isolated?

This discussion follows on from a previous post on where the mRNA used in the test and vaccines, comes from. A murky background indeed.

The foundation of the use of PCR tests for diagnosis and to determine prevalence rates is under dispute. In Vaccines Revealed (VR) Episode 6, Dr Thomas Cowan explains how people have sent him citations of around 20 peer-reviewed papers published in medical and scientific journals, where scientists assert that they have isolated this alleged novel coronavirus. This prompted Cowan, together with journalist Thorsten Englebrecht, to  contact some of the authors to check if the steps generally agreed upon to isolate the virus had been followed – invariably the answer has been no. With regard to a paper published in Nature, Cowan recounts (in the VR interview cited earlier) that the authors acknowledged: 

“We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification,” which is considered an essential step of proof.
Read more