Over 50% of the genes that we've now mapped in the human genome are able to be directly demonstrated to have been inserted by a virus sometime in the last billion years. […] We have 12,800 new genetic updates since 1976, in the last 40 years, and some of those we've taken up and others we've rejected from the human DNA.
Dr Zach Bush, Episode 1, VACCINES REVEALED
Terrain theory
“While viruses are organic material, they don’t fully fit the current definition of life. Unlike living organisms, they do not contain full DNA strands, but do carry RNA, which are snippets of genetic information. When this viral RNA enters a cell, it interacts with the DNA that is present and sends the message to create more of the viral RNA strands and proteins introduced by the virus. Sometimes the body mounts an immune defence to the virus, either sending it on its way without our being aware, or causing us to experience symptoms of illness. But just as our body hosts a microbiome that works largely for our benefit, we regularly interact with a beneficial virome that helps our body adapt to new threats and changes in our environment. These beneficial viruses are adapted into our genetic information, and the proteins gained benefit us in countless ways that researchers continue to discover.”
Dr Zach Bush
In Vaccines Revealed Episode 1, Dr Zach Bush explains some of the findings coming from sequencing of the human genome in relation to viruses and illnesses within the framing of “terrain theory”.
Bush argues that it is through these “gain-of-function viral updates” that we “adapt and experience the necessary biodiversity for life to continue.” In Bush’s view, the current proliferation of coronavirus is following the predictable pattern of viruses that have preceded it, and while a large number of people interact with it without illness, it has presented itself as a notable cause of respiratory illness at this time. At some point, our genome will adapt to it, either accepting or rejecting the viral “information it is offering. […]The PCR test, with all its power to offer us a peek at what is happening at the cellular and genomic level, is being misused as a diagnostic tool of an illness that is not always present, regardless of its proteins being present in the cells.”
This illumination on how bits of genetic code we call viruses interact with the body, is similar to Dr Thomas Cowan’s espouses.
Detoxifying mechanism being misinterpreted as exogenous “viruses”
“When you starve and poison tissue then it packages up little parcels of DNA, as a detoxification and communication strategy,” Cowan explains in Vaccines Revealed. He has come to view “viruses” as endogenous (resulting from inside the body) exosomes or intra-cellular vesicles, which act as a poison relief mechanism, which have erroneously been considered to be exogenous. He mentions that an article in the journal Viruses acknowledges that there is no “reliable method of separating viruses from exosomes.” He comments, “The only reason we cannot separate the poison detoxification mechanism from an external pathogen is because they are the same thing. […] We now know those pieces of genetic material can now resonate out into the world as a signal for other organisms that something bad has happened, some poisoning has happened, and you should defend yourself. […] So you package up this material – the DNA or the RNA has a resonance […] and then the other organisms can make the same piece of genetic material and turn that into proteins to defend themselves. So a war on these bits of genetic material, mistakenly perceived as an external threat, is a war on adaptation.”
Dr Thomas Cowan
In Cowan’s view, all test results are false positives due to primers in the COVID PCR test being part of sequences in the human genome, and also because the more cycles the tests are run at, the more likely people will be to test positive. He explains this as follows: “There's at last count 93 human sequences which match up exactly with the primers being used for the coronavirus test. In other words, they're testing for whether you're a human. There's also about 90 that come from different bacteria and fungi. So they're testing for whether you're human or a bacteria or a fungus. Now, you could say, ‘Well, why doesn't everybody test positive?’ And the answer for that is it depends on how much degradation you have.”
Cowan sees viruses as a mechanism of evolution. “They’re the mechanism of adaptation. A war on viruses is a war on life. So, the question then is, what is poisoning us? Any therapeutic so-called manoeuvre like wearing a mask or social distancing or washing your hands is just nonsense. It just makes you sicker. I can pretty much guarantee that your family doctor and your internist and your surgeon doesn’t know this either. I didn’t learn any of this in medical school or any training. This one has to figure out for themselves.”
Bush concurs on the function of viruses, which he sees as strengthening the viability and biodiversity of life on earth, commenting that “the RNA of SARS CoV-2 has already become inscribed into our DNA, and has already become part of us, thus we have incorporated this into our genetic structured and adapted to it.”
Does this signal that virology will have to catch up with the findings of genomic sequencing?