Author: Deidre May

What are COVID “vaccines”

Does the mortality rate justify the measures put in place, especially global vaccination programmes involving risky and scantily testing novel medical devices?  Many experts are resolutely saying: no. Burning questions include:

What are these “vaccines”? These are new technologies and many detractors argue that both the RNA vaccines and Johnson & Johnson’s Adenovirus vector vaccine should be classified as medical treatment/ devices.

Read more

Does the mortality rate justify the measures put in place, especially global vaccination programmes involving risky and scantily testing novel medical devices?  Many experts are resolutely saying: no. Burning questions include:

What are these “vaccines”? These are new technologies and many detractors argue that both the RNA vaccines and Johnson & Johnson’s Adenovirus vector vaccine should be classified as medical treatment/ devices.

Read more

Disconnect between representation and reality

Introduction

Since lockdowns were imposed in March 2020, many high-ranking doctors, scientists, epidemiologists, emeritus professors etc. argue that the epidemiological representation is not indicative of a global viral pandemic. This is based on:

  • Analysing the models that sent the world into lockdown, redoing these models and generating alternative models
  • Assessing the all cause mortality rate for 2020, which is available for some countries
  • Analysing the alleged deaths from COVID with many causes of deaths showing a significant drop, from influenza through to heart disease and strokes, which indicates that deaths from other causes are being subsumed under the label COVID.
Read more

Gold standard of viral isolation and the non-specificity of the tests

The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test “is so powerful that it can even isolate information that cells carry from the past, such as a fragment of genetic information that may have been circulating in your mother’s womb, a bacteria you breathed in a week ago, or if you were exposed to a virus at the grocery store. In other words, your body may have been exposed to and even reacted on a cellular level to a microbe, but that doesn’t mean you actively have or have had the disease. […] If the PCR test was used every flu season as a diagnostic tool, our flu diagnoses would likely jump, as we apply the label to those who were exposed but never actually became ill. Therefore, we have high rates of false-positive results from COVID testing because the genetic information picked up in the test is being amplified far beyond clinical relevance, and state governors and other public officials have been pushed into making drastic public health emergency decisions based upon this faulty data.

Dr Zach Bush, Vaccines Revealed Episode 1
Read more
Featured

About this blog

For decades, the mainstream media has become an increasingly unreliable source of accurate reporting and analysis, which is ever clearer in the COVID-19 era. Why are doctors and scientists, including leading academics and frequently cited peer-reviewed journal authors, who do not conform to the consensus view, being excised out of the prevailing discourse and not given space for scientific engagement?

Thankfully, they are finding their way onto the burgeoning alternative platforms, and featured by independent media sources – some of which are excellent. The current state of play makes it all the more critical for us to examine the facts and make up our own minds about what is really going on. 

This curation of research on viruses, specifically HIV, which has been linked to AIDS, and SARS CoV-2, which is said to cause COVID-19, has helped me to understand the issues better. Archived in categories, the posts flow in order from oldest to newest.