Introduction
Since lockdowns were imposed in March 2020, many high-ranking doctors, scientists, epidemiologists, emeritus professors etc. argue that the epidemiological representation is not indicative of a global viral pandemic. This is based on:
- Analysing the models that sent the world into lockdown, redoing these models and generating alternative models
- Assessing the all cause mortality rate for 2020, which is available for some countries
- Analysing the alleged deaths from COVID with many causes of deaths showing a significant drop, from influenza through to heart disease and strokes, which indicates that deaths from other causes are being subsumed under the label COVID.
Excerpt from a letter by World Doctors Alliance, which has garnered nearly 85,000 signatures
“It is also abundantly clear that the ‘pandemic’ is basically over and has been since June 2020. We have very highly likely reached herd immunity and therefore have no need for a vaccine. We have safe and very effective treatments and preventative treatments for COVID, we therefore call for an immediate end to all lockdown measures, social distancing, mask wearing, testing of healthy individuals, track and trace, immunity passports, the vaccination program and so on. There has been a catalogue of unscientific, nonsensical policies enacted which infringe our inalienable rights, such as – freedom of movement, freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. These draconian totalitarian measures must never be repeated.”
“It’s not Corona virus that’s destroying us, it’s our response […] If we continue testing indiscriminately then we are going to destroy Western civilisation […] Looking at all of the variables that are in play here with an objective scientific lens we’re missing some very important things. If you put all the weight on the Corona virus then of course you should test everybody and you should treat everybody and you should lock down whatever you have to lock down, regardless of the consequences. What you've just done is, you've externalised all those costs [...] and it's an algorithm that will continue to – one business at a time, one family at a time – ratchet us down to the point where we basically have very few actual revenue-generating activities. We will simply be dependent on distribution systems that are optimised for efficiency […] and ultimately as we've seen with Pharma, they’ll tell us what we need […] The false positives are basically causing us to – out of fear – cannibalise the small businesses and shut down major sections of our economy, which have propagating effects that are much more damaging than corona virus.” Dr James Lyons-Weiler, Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, Episode 5, Vaccines Revealed
“[I}n medicine, the epidemic threshold from which the beginning and the end of an epidemic are declared is between 150 and 200 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The Tanzanian president is one of the few presidents who understood this because he declared on June 8, 2020 that the COVID epidemic was over in his country.”
United Health Professionals, 26 August 2020
“The World Bank has just estimated that the corona pandemic has caused an increase of about 100 million people living in extreme poverty. This is not because of COVID-19. It is because of the draconian measures we have introduced.” Prof. Peter Gøtzsche, 1 December 2020
On the whole, the evidence suggests that globally we have experienced the usual patterning of influenza, barring some hotspots. It is very concerning though that in some mortality hotspots, people have been dying from severe hypoxemia, where they present with extremely low oxygen levels, and when put on ventilators many have died.
Some doctors have been commenting that low oxygen levels can be indicative of some form of environmental poisoning, which could be caused by excessive air pollution and electro-magnetic radiation due to 5G rollouts, among others, which can be exacerbated by overuse of antibiotics and will be more detrimental in vulnerable populations, such as the elderly. They urge that the real causes of these deaths should be investigated and also that vulnerable populations should be protected, where appropriate.
These experts argue that lockdowns have clearly caused some excess mortality, and since they are unjustified, the catastrophic economic impact has been far worse than that from this allegedly new disease.
Doctors, scientists and researchers are coming together in collectives to challenge the consensus view on COVID-19, and the increasingly coercive measures to push people into taking risky vaccines, as the next step to deal with this scientifically and medically unverified “pandemic”. While some scientific and medical professionals are speaking out, others have stopped voicing their opinion, due to the highly polarised and politicised context, where dissenting voices are shouted down, charged with being conspiracy theorists, or worse, alienated and threatened with losing their jobs.
Please see the next post regarding COVID-19 epidemiology.