Masks have been proven to not only be ineffective but dangerous to health
It is appalling that despite the lack of science to back up mandatory masking, we are enforcing this traumatic but unnecessary restriction onto children – never mind the many workers who have to endure being masked for 10 or more hours every day during work hours and commuting – and the general public. A mandatory mask policy is prevalent in many countries, as in South Africa.
Read moreInitially, the guidelines for treatment recommended that most critical COVID cases were to be treated as if they had acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which advises the use of ventilators. It is known however that ventilators can be very dangerous to patients and there have been many reports from doctors around the world, warning against the use of ventilators.
Read moreSince the lockdown began there have been many videos of citizens and journalists who have gone around hospitals with cameras and shown that they are not overwhelmed. This included a hospital in Queens, New York. In the early days of hard lockdowns in April, 2020, days after news broadcasts showed queues around the block to get into the hospital, a US citizen went to visit and found the queues had mysteriously vanished.
Read moreThere is dispute between doctors and scientists on some issues, as with debates regarding how dangerous variants could be, but curiously, where some agree, is on their opposition to the vaccine rollout, with detractors of the vaccines ranging from those who have been critical of other vaccines in the past to doctors and scientists who have worked/ are working on developing vaccines.
Read moreIn the previous post a scientist confirms that these vaccines could alter human DNA
In an article on Global Research on 8 March 2021, Mike Whitney notes that the vaccine made by Pfizer contains polyethylene glycol to “stabilise” it. In a 10 December 2020 article on Reuters, it was reported in an article titled: “UK issues anaphylaxis warning on Pfizer vaccine after adverse reactions,” that doctors were warning “that those who had had anaphylactic reactions in the past, and those prone to allergic reactions, should rather not take the vaccine, since this could lead to severe or even potentially life-threatening adverse events. They acknowledge that this reaction could be caused by the inclusion of polyethylene glycol as an ingredient. However, the overall the benefits still outweigh the risks, according to doctors.”
Read moreDoes the mortality rate justify the measures put in place, especially global vaccination programmes involving risky and scantily testing novel medical devices? Many experts are resolutely saying: no. Burning questions include:
What are these “vaccines”? These are new technologies and many detractors argue that both the RNA vaccines and Johnson & Johnson’s Adenovirus vector vaccine should be classified as medical treatment/ devices.
Read moreDoes the mortality rate justify the measures put in place, especially global vaccination programmes involving risky and scantily testing novel medical devices? Many experts are resolutely saying: no. Burning questions include:
What are these “vaccines”? These are new technologies and many detractors argue that both the RNA vaccines and Johnson & Johnson’s Adenovirus vector vaccine should be classified as medical treatment/ devices.
Read more